TECHNIQUE STUDY · ASHI-WAZA

Uchi Mata GaeshiHow it works and how to improve it

Counter the left support while the upper body is still controllable. Identify the left supporting foot and the last stable counter moment in eight slow right uchi-mata entries.

Japanese
内股返
Meaning
Inner-thigh throw counter
Classification
Ashi-waza
This guide
Left leg counters uke’s left supporting leg

Uchi-mata-gaeshi: the defining action

Uchi-mata-gaeshi counters uchi-mata by attacking the supporting leg while controlling the attacker’s upper body. It belongs to ashi-waza, which distinguishes it from the hand-led slipping action of uchi-mata-sukashi.

Name and scope: Uchi-mata-gaeshi (内股返), commonly rendered as inner-thigh throw counter, belongs to Ashi-waza. Searches for “uchi mata gaeshi” and the hyphenated spelling refer to the same official technique here. An informal nickname should be checked against the actual action before being treated as a separate technique.

Position convention: Uke attacks right uchi-mata and stands on the left supporting leg. In the form described here, tori uses the left leg to hook and reap uke’s left support while maintaining close hand control. The attacking right leg and supporting left leg must not be confused. Tori means the person performing the technique and uke the receiving partner. When reviewing a mirrored camera image, identify each person’s own sides first. Reverse the whole relationship for a left-sided lesson rather than changing one limb while preserving incompatible directions elsewhere.

The intended reader can already practise under supervision and wants to connect demonstration, diagnosis and decision-making. For uchi-mata-gaeshi, the central question is: counter the left support while the upper body is still controllable. Beginners can study the shape with a coach; applying it against variable resistance requires the additional recognition and control work below. The article does not assign a universal belt level or promise that one body type will succeed automatically.

Official demonstration and a second viewing reference

KODOKAN · 内股返 / Uchi-mata-gaeshi
Open this video on YouTube if the player is unavailable.
Efficient Judo · Uchi-mata-gaeshi - Demo
Open this video on YouTube if the player is unavailable.

Track the left supporting leg throughout the attack. Compare its removal with the clear attacking-leg miss in uchi-mata-sukashi, and avoid assigning names from the final fall alone.

Official reference: Kodokan. Second demonstration: Efficient Judo. Open the publisher links if either embedded player is unavailable.

A practical viewing question is: “Can I still support my own body while addressing uke’s left leg, or has the original throw already taken that support away?” Compare that question across the official and second reference. Differences in speed, partner stance or grip route may explain different appearances. Do not combine isolated details from incompatible versions into one repetition. No timestamps or claims about unseen scoring sequences are supplied here.

Recognise an opening and recognise its absence

A usable starting relationship

Uke’s right leg has entered the attack but tori retains enough independent balance and upper-body connection to address the left support. The supporting leg is accessible without tori collapsing onto it.

In right uchi-mata, uke’s raised right leg attacks while the left foot supports the rotation. Tori’s left leg addresses that lower left support in the selected counter. Establish those identities before the bodies turn, because a rear camera view can make the legs appear reversed. Tori also needs a separate support capable of carrying the torso while the countering leg moves. Naming the target correctly does not prove that this independent base still exists.

When the same shape is not an opening

Tori is already carried on the attacking thigh or cannot reach the support without twisting a trapped leg. A support-leg target visible in a still image may be unavailable in the actual timing.

If tori must lean across uke’s attacking thigh to reach the left support, the opportunity may already be gone. Compare the same grips before and after the hip-and-thigh load. In the earlier position, tori may still move the countering leg without depending on uke to hold the body up. In the later one, receive the throw. The visible support foot can remain in almost the same place while the defender’s options change completely.

Movement to invite or read

Begin with a predictable right uchi-mata entry and a clear pause before loading. Add movement only after tori can identify the support and preserve an independent base without guessing. In an opposite-lead or unfamiliar grip arrangement, have the coach map the relevant limbs again. The fixed convention in this article provides a reference for comparison; it does not guarantee that the same approach distance survives every stance.

Connect the grips, support and finishing action

Hands and upper-body connection

The hands keep uke close and organise the shoulder direction while the support is removed. They prevent the torso from simply turning away from the countering leg, but must not become an uncontrolled downward neck pull.

Feet, hips and available support

Keep an independent support for tori while the left leg reaches the lower part of uke’s left supporting leg. The hook and reap act on the supporting relationship, not as a sideways collision into the knee.

Complete the action under control

Coordinate the left-leg counter with the hand-guided body direction so uke loses the remaining support in a controlled rotation. Tori continues upper-body guidance through the fall and releases any unnecessary leg entanglement afterward.

Study the relationship beneath the visible shape

Identify the two legs by role rather than by appearance alone. In the selected right uchi-mata, uke’s right leg attacks and the left leg supports. The counter described here addresses that support. In a rotating exchange, the legs may cross visually and a camera angle can make the target difficult to recognise. Slow the demonstration and follow the supporting foot from the start of the entry instead of assigning its identity from the final frame.

Tori also needs a support. Reaching the left leg toward uke while the trunk is already carried by the attacking thigh removes that independent base. The correct-looking hook can therefore occur in a position where the counter is no longer viable. Before adding a finish, ask whether tori could still stand without uke supporting the body. If not, return to an earlier recognition point or practise receiving the original throw.

Four cues with observable checks

Keep the defining mechanism visible

Counter the left support while the upper body is still controllable. Ask the observer to describe that action before commenting on power. If a repetition succeeds through a different mechanism, record what actually happened. A fall or escape can be useful without proving that the intended uchi-mata-gaeshi relationship improved.

Verify the position before adding commitment

An observer should identify uke’s supporting left foot and tori’s independent base before the hook is added. The target should not be mistaken for the raised attacking right leg. Use this as a brief checkpoint in cooperative practice, then remove the pause as coordination improves. The checkpoint is not a recommendation to freeze during a live exchange; it is a way to identify the relationship that must survive movement.

Preserve the correct stopping decision

Use a coach-arranged unavailable position to check your decision before adding resistance to uchi-mata-gaeshi. The precise release or reception boundary is described in the defence section below. Otherwise, a partner who always supplies the ideal opening can teach commitment without teaching selection. A correct reset belongs in the practice record alongside a controlled completion.

Make the result lead to a next position

The counter can bring both partners down close to the supporting leg. Maintain control of the upper body while freeing the countering leg so that the landing does not become a knee entanglement. The observer should describe the actual ending, not the intended ending. That description determines whether the next task belongs to finishing, stabilising on top or recovering underneath.

Diagnose the earliest cause before changing force

Tori reaches the support but is thrown by the original uchi-mata before the counter develops.

Recognition may occur after the attacking thigh has already loaded tori. The countering reach may remove tori’s own support before the hands have controlled the torso. These are competing explanations to investigate, not a diagnosis made from the result alone. The next repetition should reveal which relationship fails first.

Test: Stop a slow uchi-mata entry before loading and name both support feet. Rehearse the countering contact without throwing, then compare it with the later position where tori can no longer pause independently. Adjustment: Move the recognition point earlier and shorten the countering reach while preserving the hand connection. Keep the other conditions as similar as practical for the comparison. An improvement in the relevant connection is more informative than one accidental completion after several unrelated changes.

Uke feels pressure at the side of the knee

If uke feels pressure at the side of the knee rather than a guided loss of support, stop and have the contact reviewed. Do not use more force to compensate for a wrong height or angle. For uchi-mata-gaeshi, partner feedback should identify where the action was felt and when it changed. Combine that report with the observer’s view; an outside camera and an inside contact sensation provide different pieces of evidence.

Rehearse torso direction, then add lower-leg contact

The hand connection helps determine whether removing the support creates a controlled fall. If uke’s shoulders are free to turn away, the leg action may produce an unpredictable scramble rather than the intended counter. Rehearse the torso direction separately at low force, then add the lower-leg contact while preserving the same connection. The observer should see the two actions cooperate rather than one occurring after the other has already failed.

Contact height requires direct attention. A hook at the lower supporting leg is not permission to drive sideways into the knee. If the target moves during the approach, the correct response may be to remove the countering leg. Treating a disappearing target as something to chase can turn an early counter into an uncontrolled joint load. The practice must include that stop decision.

Make the next action depend on a response

First route: starting position, response and continuation

Uke enters right uchi-mata from controlled grips. Tori uses uchi-mata-gaeshi only when the left support is accessible and the original lift has not taken control. If the attacking leg misses and only forward rotation remains, study the hand-led sukashi option separately rather than mixing the two mechanisms.

For the right-uchi-mata setup, uke alternates an early entry with an accessible left support and a controlled completed load. Tori prepares the counter only in the first case. A third response lets the attacking leg miss while the shoulders continue turning; study that separately as a possible sukashi relationship. The observer records which mechanism was selected rather than counting every reversal as proof that the support-leg counter was correctly timed.

Second route: recovery or change of direction

If uke retracts the attacking leg and restores two-footed posture, remove the countering hook and return to facing grips. A fresh forward or backward attack can follow the recovery, but the support-leg counter window has closed.

When uke puts the right attacking foot down and restores a two-footed stance, tori removes the left countering hook. The support that was briefly carrying the attack is no longer the same isolated target. Return to facing grips and read the next movement. Keeping the hook attached through a changing stance can turn an early counter into an uncontrolled knee entanglement. A fresh attack should begin only after that leg relationship has been released.

Separate prevention, recovery and a counter opportunity

The original attacker can reduce exposure by entering with close upper-body control and a purposeful supporting stance. The defender should first preserve balance; reaching for a support leg is not a substitute for avoiding a successful load.

Stop boundary: Receive the original uchi-mata when independent support is lost. Stop the hook if the target foot has moved, the contact shifts to the knee or the hands can no longer guide the fall. The receiving partner must retain an agreed ukemi response when the original attack has succeeded. Do not replace reception with a desperate straight-arm post or a joint-twisting rescue.

The attacker reduces exposure by keeping the upper body connected while entering on a purposeful left support. A loose arm connection may permit the defender to remain upright and address that foot. Rehearse both versions slowly, without asking the defender to force a counter in the connected version. Tori’s first task is retaining balance; when the attacking thigh has already taken it, reception is the appropriate response rather than a late hook at the knee.

Read the position after the main action

Once on top, establish chest contact and a stable hip base before choosing a side hold. If uke turns to the knees, control the shoulders from a balanced position rather than keeping a standing leg hook attached to a ground scramble.

The hooked support can become trapped between the bodies during the descent. Tori should retain upper-body guidance while letting the standing leg contact release as the partners settle. If uke lands on the knees, move to a stable top angle without kneeling onto the lower leg. If uke lands on the back, establish chest contact and a free hip base before a hold. Removing support in standing practice is not the same task as controlling it on the ground.

A completed throw and an established hold are separate outcomes. A controlled landing can still require leg clearance or shoulder repositioning before useful top control exists. Compare the actual uchi-mata-gaeshi ending with the planned one, and practise the common arrival independently if it repeatedly becomes the weak part of the sequence.

Progress from a clear shape to a real choice

Stage one: make the reference repeatable

Use the stated uchi-mata-gaeshi convention with a cooperative partner. Begin slowly enough to identify the grip and support roles, and stop before completing an action that has lost its defining connection. Progress when both partners and the observer can describe the same relationship without guessing. Repetition count alone does not establish readiness.

Stage two: introduce the movement cue

Revisit the specific moving relationship described under “When to use it” for uchi-mata-gaeshi. First keep its direction predictable, then vary its timing while preserving the same grips and side convention. Keep resistance modest while the cue changes. If the reference shape disappears on every moving attempt, reduce the step or escape amplitude and preserve the correct direction rather than forcing a finish.

Stage three: require a decision

Uke offers either an early accessible support or a controlled successful load. Tori chooses counter preparation in the first case and reception in the second, with no late rescue attempt. A useful round includes a correct continuation and a correct decision not to continue. Record both. When these choices remain clear, increase unpredictability before increasing force, with the coach deciding what the pair can control.

Stage four: constrain the exchange, then broaden it

Use an announced-response drill first: uke states whether the entry will stop before loading or complete a controlled load. Tori practises counter preparation for the first and reception for the second. Once both actions are comfortable, remove the announcement while preserving slow speed. This tests perception without introducing an unpredictable full-force counter exchange.

In review, separate correct target identification from correct timing. A learner may name the left support perfectly and still act too late. Conversely, an early opportunity may be wasted because the countering leg reaches the wrong relationship. Recording both dimensions gives the next session a precise task. The eventual goal is to recognise the support and the remaining time together, while keeping enough upper-body control to guide the landing.

A named official replay selection to study

Verified selection: Rafaela SILVA vs Brisa GOMEZ — Tbilisi Grand Slam 2024. The IJF technique library page includes this contest in its Uchi-mata-gaeshi technique-tagged replay data. The listing verifies the named pairing, event and technique tag. The listing credits the tagged action to Rafaela Silva. It does not by itself establish the final score, a precise timestamp or a complete tactical account.

Use the selection to investigate one question: “Can I still support my own body while addressing uke’s left leg, or has the original throw already taken that support away?” Before the tagged action, identify the grips and movement that made the situation possible. During the action, compare the defining connection with the official demonstration. Afterward, identify recovery and position. If the player or angle does not show one of those phases, leave that part of the observation blank rather than inferring it from the tag.

A useful competition note for uchi-mata-gaeshi separates three things: what the official listing states, what you can actually see in playback and what you propose to test in practice. This article confirms the first and supplies prompts for the other two. It does not present an unviewed sequence as a frame-by-frame analysis, nor treat historical footage as certification under current event rules.

Keep neighbouring techniques and variants distinct

Uchi-mata-sukashi avoids the attacking leg and guides the remaining rotation through the hands. Uchi-mata-gaeshi uses a supporting-leg counter. Hane-goshi-gaeshi and harai-goshi-gaeshi resemble it in targeting support, but the incoming hip and leg actions differ.

Uchi-mata-sukashi makes the attacking thigh miss and guides the continuing turn through the hands. This guide instead addresses the support of uchi-mata. Harai-goshi-gaeshi also targets a supporting leg, but the incoming hip sweep changes the body contact and recognition cue. Compare the attack that loads tori before assuming that the same-looking counter foot can be used at the same moment.

One task, one observation and one next decision

Task: Identify the left supporting foot and the last stable counter moment in eight slow right uchi-mata entries.

Record: Record early recognition, correct support contact and whether a safe reception replaced a late counter attempt. Use the practice record template or the practice tools described in Judo AI. Include the starting stance, partner response and the single adjustment tested, so the observation remains interpretable at the next session.

Illustrative example — not measured user data: A sample log shows four accessible support positions and four entries where the load arrived first. Three early positions retained hand control. The next drill improves that connection instead of attempting to counter the four late positions.

Coach question: “Can I still support my own body while addressing uke’s left leg, or has the original throw already taken that support away?” Bring one clear success and one clear failure if recording is permitted. For uchi-mata-gaeshi, choose the next drill from the earliest difference between them. Keep an adjustment that improves the intended connection across several comparable attempts; revise it when the predicted change does not appear. The purpose of the record is a better next decision, not a decorative count of repetitions.

Sources, authorship and review

Kodokan official technique names establish the name and category. The IJF Uchi-mata-gaeshi definition and video library and linked Kodokan demonstration are the primary technical references. The second video above is credited separately. The official replay listing in section 11 verifies the named contest and technique tag, not an unviewed score or every coaching proposal here.

By Judo AI · Editorial review: October 9, 2026. Definitions, source identity, article consistency and links have been checked. Practice tasks and diagnostic questions are editorial proposals to discuss with your coach, not a validated training protocol. Named technical-coach approval is still pending. Video identities were verified; complete playback and every contest detail have not been independently analysed.

Rules and scope: this is a supervised judo study guide, not a current refereeing manual. Historical footage does not establish current rule permissions. Ask your coach to check the applicable age group and event rules before using grip variations or submissions in shiai; this draft does not certify their legality. Stop a practice action when your partner taps, asks to stop or reports pain.

Browse all technique study guides · Official 100-technique reference · Training guides.