Short answer
A useful ne-waza drill names the starting position, each partner’s task and the point at which to stop or reset. Use a familiar hold or escape already taught by your coach. Record whether the difficulty appears while reaching the position, maintaining control or responding to the partner’s escape; these are different practice questions. Agree the roles before starting, follow the dojo’s stop signals immediately, and let the coach set resistance and duration. Do not turn a position-review exercise into an improvised choke or joint-lock experiment.

Separate reaching control from keeping it
If a drill begins with a familiar hold already established, it cannot tell you how you reached that position from an earlier exchange. Label the start in your notes. You might write: “Started in the agreed hold; the partner began the taught escape; I lost the position at that change.” That identifies a moment to review without prescribing a stronger squeeze. In a separate coach-selected task, the starting point may be earlier so the entry can be observed. Keep those results separate and ask which task addresses the current problem. A practice reset is not a competition scoring judgment.
Make the partner task clear before contact
Listen for more than the name of the position in the demonstration. Identify which partner is practising, what the other partner is expected to do and which movement belongs to the assigned exercise. Before starting, describe the task back in plain words. If one person expects a cooperative rehearsal and the other expects open resistance, clarify the mismatch first. Confirm the demonstrated starting arrangement and the agreed reset with the coach; do not create a new escape or continuation to fill a gap in your understanding.
Keep an observation task narrow enough to describe afterwards. You might watch whether you noticed the partner beginning the taught response, or whether both partners returned to the same start after a reset. Those are observations about the exercise, not instructions to overpower the response. Stop immediately for the dojo’s stop signals and any request to stop. When the coach introduces freer ne-waza, relabel your notes: the partner may now choose among different actions. An outcome from that task should not be counted as an equivalent repeat of the cooperative exercise.
One-week plan
Plan around the dojo sessions you can actually attend. Note the assigned task and the feedback to revisit, leaving room for the coach to change the programme. A week is a planning window, not a deadline for progressing from repetition to randori. Record missed or changed sessions instead of compensating with extra practice.
Write a five-field positional-practice note
Use task, starting arrangement, observed change, feedback and next check. A hypothetical note reads: “Familiar assigned ground exercise / [write the actual starting position demonstrated by the coach] / recognised the first response but lost track after the task changed / not yet received / confirm the agreed responses before the next attempt.” The bracketed field must describe where the exercise actually started, not just the partner’s role. Keep feedback marked as missing until it is given. Use actual observations; do not add a hold time, success total or technical cause you did not observe.
Keep a new line for a different partner, role or starting condition. Mark the exercise as cooperative or freer so later comparisons retain their context. After the next session, add whether you checked the same question, checked a different one or did not reach that situation. The existing practice-log worksheet or an ordinary notebook can hold this record; using an app is optional. If you use video, obtain the partner’s permission and follow dojo rules. Keep only the material needed for review, and never treat a practice note as a competition decision.
Safety and coaching
To apply Ne-waza at the dojo, judo should be trained with a qualified coach, especially when throws, strangles, arm locks, or hard randori are involved. Use this guide to prepare better questions and cleaner practice goals, not to replace live correction or local safety rules.
Compare task instructions before comparing outcomes
Imagine two supervised practices of a familiar ground position. In A, the coach asks the receiving partner to provide one previously taught response. In B, the coach allows a choice of familiar responses. You remain in the intended position in A but lose it in B. The visible difference is an outcome under different instructions; it is not proof that your technique suddenly became worse. Write down the instructions beside each result before searching for a technical explanation. If you did not see which response began in B, leave that detail unknown.
Review the earliest moment you can describe: did the partner begin the expected action, choose something else or move outside the useful camera view? Ask whether the next assigned exercise should revisit recognition of that response or another part of the task. Do not reconstruct hidden grips or pressure from a still frame. A partner’s explanation can add context, but keep it labelled as feedback rather than something the video showed. This example does not prescribe how to escape or maintain a hold; that demonstration belongs with the qualified coach.
How to diagnose the real problem
Describe the starting grip, posture and movement you actually observed, including the relevant lead-up. A fixed number of seconds or rounds cannot identify the cause. Separate observations from possible explanations and compare them with the assigned task.
Start the review with the position and partner roles actually agreed for that attempt. A visible turn may show that the arrangement changed, but it does not reveal every contact, force or intention. If the view loses a hand, record that gap rather than naming a grip that must have been there. When both partners restart, separate the observed restart from its reason. Compare with an attempt that matched the assigned task, checking whether the start and permitted responses were comparable.
How to adjust when it fails
If you lose track of the exercise, explain where you became unsure before changing it. Ask which condition the coach wants adjusted and confirm it with your partner. Do not independently add resistance or shorten the distance to make an unfamiliar action work.
- Describe where you became unsure.
- Confirm the adjustment with your coach and partner.
- Keep one video or note as evidence.
- Record the next question; leave an unagreed task undecided.
How to turn it into a Judo AI action
Use the linked worksheet or paper to write the starting position, each role and the first change you can describe. Put the partner’s explanation beside your observation, labelled as feedback rather than something the image proved. Keep a question about hidden contact open instead of turning it into a confirmed weakness. Copy or print the worksheet; it does not save your entry online. If digital organisation would help, review the Judo AI feature guide before choosing it; an app record does not establish control or improvement.
Progress signals to look for
Record whether the intended grip appeared, where the entry stopped and what decision followed. An earlier attack or a different outcome is a question to review, not proof that the method caused improvement. Note the partner, assigned task and changed conditions beside the observation. Leave unseen or forgotten details unresolved rather than interpreting every difference as progress.
Questions to bring to your coach
Ask about a concrete uncertainty: “We restarted after my partner turned; was that the agreed end of this task, or did you stop us for another reason?” Do not assume the restart means an escape succeeded. Also bring an attempt in which you followed the task, and ask what conditions made it comparable. Explain “I felt tired” as your experience, not a measured cause. The useful next question may concern understanding the instruction, noticing a response or clarifying the starting position, not adding another technique.
When to move to the next theme
Review the next task with your coach using comparable notes. A fixed number of successes in randori is not a universal progression test. Record what was understood and which conditions changed; revisiting, adapting or changing the task are all possible next steps.
Decide what you want to understand from this ne-waza review, then keep only the detail needed to revisit that question. A short written recollection is enough if marked as memory; video is optional and sharing requires permission. At the next agreed review, note whether you actually attempted the same assigned task and whether the partner role or start changed. Keep successful comparisons as well as unresolved moments. No opportunity to try the task means it remains untested, not that the idea failed.
A score is only one part of the record. Compare whether you understood the assigned task, recognised its starting situation and can explain the feedback you received. These notes do not establish that practice is safer or that you are ready to progress. Discuss the next task with your coach; the record sets no automatic extra week of practice.
If fatigue makes the assigned exercise, controlled movement or ukemi difficult to maintain, stop that exercise and tell the coach. Fewer attacks alone do not justify continuing. Follow the dojo's decision about a break, adaptation or ending the task.
Checklist
- Choose one exchange to review.
- Separate what you saw from what you inferred.
- Write one question for your coach.
- Record the agreed focus for your next session.
Use this in your next session
Prepare a practice note
Copy the fields into your notes or print this reference; it is not an online editor. Add a situation and a question for your coach.
Keep the evidence together
See how Judo AI connects practice notes, video review and technique progress before deciding whether it fits your training.
Check the available features
Review the app’s features and choose the tools that support your current practice task.