Short answer
Uchi-komi rehearses a familiar throw’s entry without completing the throw; nage-komi includes the throw. Give the repetition a specific question instead of chasing a count. With your coach, choose the starting grip and whether the exercise is stationary or moving, agree the partner’s role, and identify one feature to observe, such as whether the agreed grip remains in place through the entry. Ask for feedback before changing the task. More speed, resistance or repetitions are not automatic corrections. Keep the exercise within the technique and conditions your coach has already taught.

An entry repetition needs a clear starting condition
If one repetition begins from the agreed sleeve-and-lapel grip and the next starts after the sleeve has slipped, the count hides two different situations. Record that difference before calling one entry better. A useful note might be: “The first entries used the agreed grip; later I reset it differently. Which starting position should I repeat?” Let the coach decide whether the next task stays stationary or includes movement. Uchi-komi can isolate a question about entry, but a smooth cooperative repetition does not establish that the same attack will work against an independently responding partner in randori.
Turn the demonstration into an agreed repetition
Before starting, describe the demonstrated exercise back to your partner: which familiar entry, which starting arrangement and who begins the movement. Include where the repetition ends and how the pair returns to the assigned start. If one person expects movement and the other expects to remain in place, clarify the instruction before continuing. This is not an invitation to invent a new entry. The coach’s demonstration, available mat space and assigned partner roles set the boundaries for this practice.
Keep stationary and moving practice as separate labels in your notes. For stationary work, observe whether each repetition actually begins in the agreed arrangement. For movement work assigned by the coach, observe whether the intended start occurs before your entry or whether you stop to reconstruct it. Do not deliberately add that pause as a technical rule: simply note it if it happens. A change of partner can change the starting situation too. Check the shared instruction again rather than assuming that both people interpret the task identically.
One-week plan
Plan around the dojo sessions you can actually attend. Note the assigned task and the feedback to revisit, leaving room for the coach to change the programme. A week is a planning window, not a deadline for progressing from repetition to randori. Record missed or changed sessions instead of compensating with extra practice.
Save five fields, not just a repetition total
Use these fields: exercise; starting condition and roles; observation; feedback; next check. A sample note is: “Familiar entry with assigned movement; partner initiates, no completed throw; I paused after the first step because I was unsure when to enter; coach repeated the instruction; check whether I recognise the agreed moment next time.” This is a report of uncertainty, not a diagnosis of bad timing. Replace the sample with your actual exercise and feedback; do not record an explanation as confirmed if it was only your guess.
Add a short context note when the task changes: new partner, different movement, a new instruction or an omitted part. Keep those attempts separate from the earlier group. If you did not observe the agreed point, write “not checked” rather than a success score. A notebook or the linked practice-log worksheet is enough; no app is required to use this process. At the next comparable exercise, reopen the note and compare the same observation. The value is a traceable learning question, not an impressive repetition total.
Safety and coaching
To apply Drills at the dojo, judo should be trained with a qualified coach, especially when throws, strangles, arm locks, or hard randori are involved. Use this guide to prepare better questions and cleaner practice goals, not to replace live correction or local safety rules.
Compare a prepared start with a start found in movement
Consider a hypothetical class reviewing the same familiar entry in two assigned exercises. In the first, the partners prepare the starting position before each repetition. In the second, the coach introduces a known movement before the entry. The student reports that the first feels clear but the second includes a pause. The useful comparison is not “moving practice is bad” or “I need to go faster”. Identify where the pause appears: before the partner moves, after the movement begins or when the entry is expected.
Bring that observation to the demonstration: did you understand who initiates, or did the pair start the next repetition from a different arrangement? Ask to see the uncertain moment again. On the next assigned attempt, check that particular point and record what was visible, even if the result is still unclear. Do not finish the throw unexpectedly to make the repetition feel successful. A cooperative moving exercise is also not equivalent to randori; it does not establish that the same entry works against every independent response.
How to diagnose the real problem
Describe the starting grip, posture and movement you actually observed, including the relevant lead-up. A fixed number of seconds or rounds cannot identify the cause. Separate observations from possible explanations and compare them with the assigned task.
Locate the uncertainty within the intended entry rather than rating the whole set. Was the starting distance as demonstrated, was the agreed cue recognisable, and what did uke actually do before you entered? Uke is the partner receiving the entry; their assigned role belongs in the comparison. Choose the question that fits the moment, not a compulsory checklist after every repetition. A completed repetition and a report that it felt smooth are different observations. Neither alone shows that the entry is retained later or usable with another partner.
How to adjust when it fails
If you lose track of the exercise, explain where you became unsure before changing it. Ask which condition the coach wants adjusted and confirm it with your partner. Do not independently add resistance or shorten the distance to make an unfamiliar action work.
- Describe where you became unsure.
- Confirm the adjustment with your coach and partner.
- Keep one video or note as evidence.
- Record the next question; leave an unagreed task undecided.
How to turn it into a Judo AI action
On paper or the linked worksheet, describe a particular repetition: intended entry, agreed start and uke’s role, what happened, and feedback actually received. Leave an unknown cue unknown rather than supplying it from the demonstration. Include a repetition that matched the task as well as one you want to understand. A video is optional, and sharing needs permission. For digital support, inspect the linked Judo AI feature guide; recording an exercise does not confirm that its explanation is correct or its learning has transferred.
Progress signals to look for
Record whether the intended grip appeared, where the entry stopped and what decision followed. An earlier attack or a different outcome is a question to review, not proof that the method caused improvement. Note the partner, assigned task and changed conditions beside the observation. Leave unseen or forgotten details unresolved rather than interpreting every difference as progress.
Questions to bring to your coach
Ask about a concrete contrast: “In this repetition I entered after uke began the assigned step; in the other I waited until it ended. Which moment were we practising?” Ask uke what instruction they understood, without treating their answer as proof of what happened. Bring the starting distance and any changed cue into the discussion. Record the coach’s actual reply, including a request to observe again. A successful exchange can clarify the intended task; you do not need to invent a fault in it.
When to move to the next theme
Review the next task with your coach using comparable notes. A fixed number of successes in randori is not a universal progression test. Record what was understood and which conditions changed; revisiting, adapting or changing the task are all possible next steps.
At an agreed later review, distinguish doing the repetitions from recognising the intended entry again. Note whether you needed the cue repeated and whether the start or uke’s assigned role had changed. If another partner is assigned, describe that condition separately rather than treating it as a harder test or automatic proof of transfer. A short written recollection is enough when labelled as memory. Keep what remains unclear; if the task was not attempted, record that without judging the method ineffective.
A score is only one part of the record. Compare whether you understood the assigned task, recognised its starting situation and can explain the feedback you received. These notes do not establish that practice is safer or that you are ready to progress. Discuss the next task with your coach; the record sets no automatic extra week of practice.
If fatigue makes the assigned exercise, controlled movement or ukemi difficult to maintain, stop that exercise and tell the coach. Fewer attacks alone do not justify continuing. Follow the dojo's decision about a break, adaptation or ending the task.
Checklist
- Choose one exchange to review.
- Separate what you saw from what you inferred.
- Write one question for your coach.
- Record the agreed focus for your next session.
Use this in your next session
Prepare a practice note
Copy the fields into your notes or print this reference; it is not an online editor. Add a situation and a question for your coach.
Keep the evidence together
See how Judo AI connects practice notes, video review and technique progress before deciding whether it fits your training.
Check the available features
Review the app’s features and choose the tools that support your current practice task.